This woman would crack me up if it weren’t that she has serious followers; now, THOSE just frighten the bejeezus out of me…They believe and agree with her interpretation and perspective on things?? REALLY?! But, hey, her publicity people really seem to know how to milk the situation to give them a reason to spout out more of this, this, whatever it is that she spouts…
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Organizers+university+cancelled+Coulter/2721580/story.html
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Organizers+university+cancelled+Coulter/2721580/story.html
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Organizers+university+cancelled+Coulter/2721580/story.html
Organizers, not university cancelled Ann Coulter: U of O
Organizers for the Ann Coulter speech in Marion Hall at the University of Ottawa, had a difficult time dealing with the crush of people at the front doors just prior to the speech being
OTTAWA – In a brief statement Wednesday University of Ottawa President Allan Rock defended his institution and said that free expression is a core value of the school that bills itself as Canada’s university.
“Freedom of expression is a core value that the University of Ottawa has always promoted. We have a long history of hosting contentious and controversial speakers on our campus. Last night was no exception, as people gathered here to listen to and debate Ann Coulter’s opinions.”
Rock’s statement said organizers of the speech themselves decided at 7:50 p.m. Tuesday to cancel the event and informed the university’s security services on site of their decision.
The statement said a crowd of about 1,000 people had “peacefully gathered at Marion Hall.”
“I encourage our students faculty and other members of our community to maintain our university as an open forum for diverse opinions. Ours is a safe and democratic environment for the expression of views, and we will keep it that way,” Rock, who is a former federal minister of Justice in the Jean Chrétien cabinet, said in the statement.
The university indicated it will make no further comment on the matter.
Ottawa police were also issuing statements about the Ann Coulter affair Wednesday
Ottawa police spokesperson Alain Boucher said the police did not shut down the event, but said a different venue was needed to hold the crowd of around 1,500 people.
“We strongly suggested that this venue was not large enough to accommodate all the people that had attended,” he said. “We had safety concerns with the sheer number of people that were there…with different views on issues.”
Rock’s statement was issued in response to an event in which protesters prevented Coulter from giving a speech. She told the Citizen Tuesday night, that the cancellation proved the point she came to make — free speech in Canada leaves much to be desired.
Then she said what she really thought of the student protesters who surrounded Marion Hall, making it too unsafe, in the view of her bodyguard, for the pundit to attempt entry.
“The University of Ottawa is really easy to get into, isn’t it?” she said in an interview with the Citizen after the cancelled event.
“I never get any trouble at the Ivy League schools. It’s always the bush-league schools.”
Coulter said she has been speaking regularly at university campuses for a decade. While she has certainly been heckled, she said this is the first time a speaking engagement has had to be cancelled because of protesters.
“This has never, ever, ever happened before — even at the stupidest American university,” she said.
Coulter remarked on the reception she has had since entering the country.
“Since I’ve arrived in Canada, I’ve been denounced on the floor of Parliament — which, by the way, is on my bucket list — my posters have been banned, I’ve been accused of committing a crime in a speech that I have not yet given, I was banned by the student council, so welcome to Canada!”
The “accusation” Coulter speaks of is a reference to an e-mail she received from University of Ottawa vice-president and provost François Houle on Friday, warning her that freedom of speech is defined differently in Canada than in the U.S. and that she should take care not to step over the line.
Coulter said that letter set the tone for and encouraged the protesters. She said it’s well known on the campus speaking circuit that conservatives need to travel with security staff, as she did.
“I’m pretty sure little François A-Houle does not need to travel with a bodyguard,” she said. “I would like to know when this sort of violence, this sort of protest, has been inflicted upon a Muslim — who appear to be, from what I’ve read of the human rights complaints, the only protected group in Canada. I think I’ll give my speech tomorrow night in a burqa. That will protect me.”
Canadian conservative political commentator Ezra Levant, the other speaker travelling with Coulter on the three-city tour, presented by the International Free Press Society of Canada, told the half-filled hall that no more people would be able to enter and that Coulter had been advised it would not be safe for her to appear. Coulter’s bodyguard ultimately made the judgment, after conferring with security staff on site.
In a short speech, Levant said Tuesday was “an embarrassing day for the University of Ottawa and their student body, who could not debate Ann Coulter … who chose to silence her through threats and intimidation, just like their vice-president did.”
Levant laid the blame squarely on Houle.
“A fish rots from the head down,” he said. “François Houle got his wish. He telegraphed to the community that the University of Ottawa is not a place for free debate.”
Houle could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.
Levant said the spectacle showed “just how eroded our Canadian values of free speech have become” — especially on university campuses.
“I think this has turned into a teaching moment for the entire country, a reminder that freedom of speech is a Canadian value,” he said.
Rita Valeriano was one of several protesters inside the hall who, with chants of “Coulter go home!”, shouted down the International Free Press Society of Canada organizer who was addressing the crowd.
Valeriano, a 19-year-old sociology and women’s studies student, said later that she was happy Coulter was unable to speak the “hatred” she had planned to.
“On campus, we promise our students a safe and positive space,” she said. “And that’s not what (Coulter) brings.”
Outside the hall, Sameena Topan, 26, a conflict studies and human rights major at the U of O, spoke to the Citizen on behalf of a group of protesters.
“We have a large group of students that can very clearly outline the difference between discourse and discrimination,” Topan said of the protest. “We wanted to mobilize and make sure that’s clear on campus, that there’s a line between controversy and discrimination, and Ann Coulter has crossed it. Numerous times.”
“We had concerns about (the event) at the beginning, but especially after we saw what happened at the University of Western Ontario, when she called out a Muslim girl there and was saying she needs to take a camel because Muslim people shouldn’t fly. That kind of stuff just reaffirmed everything that we were afraid of and that’s when … we really got worried.”
Topan was pleased to hear the
students behind her shout, “Hate speech cancelled!” in unison.
“I think that’s great. I think we accomplished what we were here to do, to ensure that we don’t have her discriminatory rhetoric on our campus,” she said.
Jonathan Reid, 18, a Carleton political science student and a fan of Coulter, brought a book to be signed.
During the protest outside after the event was cancelled, Reid and a group of other students shouted a counter-chant, “No more commies on our campus!,” while pumping their fists. The Coulter protesters moved forward to face them, and TV crew lights lit angry faces.
“It’s a shame,” Reid said of the cancellation. “They claim we’re the intolerant ones, yet they’re the ones who refuse to allow a Conservative speaker to come to campus. That is the definition of intolerance.”
U of O political science student Faris Lehn, 23, said he doesn’t support Coulter’s message, but had hoped for a debate.
“It’s too bad she didn’t get to speak because I think she would have made herself look more ridiculous than anyone here could have made her look,” Lehn said.
“The problem with Ann Coulter … is that the arguments that she uses don’t necessarily promote good debate, they promote this,” he said, glancing at the chanting crowd.
Now, Lehn worries that people hoping for some of Coulter’s popularity might resort to inflammatory methods for attention.
“Your only hope is that this doesn’t … get into our media dialogue, that someone doesn’t pick this up and say, ‘I can make a career out of being a Canadian Ann Coulter’,” he said.
This isn’t the first time the best-selling pundit has been met by protesters who wouldn’t grant her the freedom to speak.
“I love to engage in repartee with people who are stupider than I am,” she reported told a crowd at the University of Connecticut when they began to jeer her, according to The Huffington Post website.
In a 2004 engagement at the University of Arizona in Tucson, Coulter was attacked by two pie-throwing men, says the blog site.
In 2008, student groups at Columbia University in New York City protested her presence by selling black T-shirts that featured Coulter’s face with a line through it.
Also in 2008, at a New Jersey college, students distributed armbands and pamphlets to protest her engagement on campus. In the midst of her speech, about 40 students stood up and started shouting: “Gay, straight, black, white! Same struggle, same fight.” Despite the interruption, Coulter earned $24,000 U.S. for her 40-minute speech, says The Huffington Post.
With files from Robert Sibley
Here we go; this article makes a lot of sense! …and I’ve only heard her once on television and read two articles quoting her extensively, so I guess (I would like to believe) that this author’s view of it being good if she were to be labelled an entertainer makes sense!
Still, the people who follow her fervently, who agree with the stuff she says, are the ones that really merit the attention of sympathy… Coulter might think it is theater and is making too much easy money to really allow her morals and values, if she has any (?), to have her tone it all down, but still, I’m just blown away at their demonstated beliefs…
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/03/24/f-rfa-macdonald.html#ixzz0j8hNQtiV
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/03/24/f-rfa-macdonald.html#ixzz0j8hNQtiV
Uncivil speech
Neil Macdonald
The poop on Ann Coulter
Last Updated: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 | 5:09 PM ET Comments22Recommend63.
By Neil Macdonald CBC News
Ezra Levant, clever bugger that he is, has just proved once again that you can count on Canada’s university crowd to behave like suckers.
This time, his tool was Ann Coulter, the right-wing comedienne and thrower of stink bombs who used to be quite a sensation here in the United States.
Levant, a conservative gadfly and former Reform Party official, made a good choice in deciding to use Coulter. She grabs attention, partly, as she herself has acknowledged, because of her looks.
Conservative author Ann Coulter addresses the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington on Saturday Feb. 20,2010. (Jose Luis Magana/Associated Press) It’s unusual to hear a slender, elegant blonde talk trash the way she does.
At the peak of her fame in 2005, she stared back from the cover of Time magazine, sitting with those endless legs crossed, taking up half the photo.
Since then, though, the novelty has worn off, at least down here.
She still commands a loyal following among the Tea Party crowd and Fox News viewers. But most other outlets have lost interest and moved on.
Like the young neo-con Tucker Carlson in his bowtie, the act got boring.
Don’t be a poopy pants
I actually interviewed Coulter once, six years ago, for the better part of an hour.
She had been writing extensively about liberal media bias and was promoting a new book. Therefore, she was available for a sit-down.
Like an earnest dope, I did my due diligence, gathering serious research on the subject and reading non-anecdotal evidence like polling data on journalistic attitudes.
Much of that suggested the media is a pretty bourgeois, fiscally conservative bunch with a deep tendency to genuflect to power and protect the status quo.
After some initial fencing, I started laying out my data and the citations, asking Coulter how it squared with her thesis that we’re all socialist stooges.
She swatted it all aside, declaring herself uninterested in such facts and went on the attack. She might as well have called me a big stupid poopy pants. That’s pretty much how the rest of the interview went.
After the cameras stopped, and before she hopped into her limo, she told me in a very endearing way that, really, I had to lighten up.
Basically, she was telling me, this is just theatre. Have some fun. Toodles.
Free speech for me
These days, Coulter is reportedly available for $10,000 a speech, going from one venue to another, calling people all sorts of names even more insulting than stupid poopy pants.
Ten grand is a pretty modest sum in the industry of public speaking, and evidently affordable enough for the International Free Press Institute, a group of right-wing activists for whom Levant serves as an adviser.
Ezra Levant tells a partially filled auditorium of Ann Coulter supporters that her appearance has been canceled at the University of Ottawa because of security concerns. (Pawel Dwulit/Canadian Press) Now, I know Ezra Levant and I admire him.
He’s a free-speech absolutist (so am I, essentially), and a proven adept at raising hell in the humourless, astringent world of academia and the industry that has grown up around speech regulation.
He generally targets those who loudly assert their own right to speak their minds, but who would blithely fine, sanction or even imprison those who, in speaking their minds, cross the lines of political correctness.
Nat Hentoff, the brilliant American First Amendment activist, distilled their philosophy nicely in the title of one of his books: Free Speech For Me, But Not For Thee.
These folks are an easy target for Levant, rising as they do whenever he waves a little bait over the water.
In fact, in promoting three Coulter speeches in Canada this week, Levant blogged that “I can hardly wait to hear her comments — and to see if any of our events are crashed by human rights commission stormtroopers!”
Baiting lefties
That kind of left-wing baiting is more or less what he was doing when I first met him in 1993. Then, he was a law student at the University of Alberta and he had just pranked everyone by tacking up notices claiming the school was discriminating against Jews.
When outraged students showed up at a protest he organized, they were treated to an attack on the university’s quota system, which reserved spots at the law school specifically for native students. Levant, a Jew, would not qualify for one of these reserved seats.
Predictably, native students claimed this was hate speech and, just as predictably, the dean of student affairs wrote Levant threatening to expel him.
When I interviewed him for the CBC, he was happily relishing the uproar.
Fast forward 17 years to this week and Levant had provoked another university official, this time University of Ottawa provost Francois Houle, into writing another letter.
Houle wrote Coulter even before she had entered the country to advise her of Canadians’ great respect for the fundamental right of free expression.
In the same breath, Houle then warned her that Canada has certain laws governing speech that America doesn’t have.
“I therefore encourage you to educate yourself, if need be, as to what is acceptable in Canada and to do so before your planned visit here.”
Take a camel
Bingo.
Houle’s letter was promptly forwarded to reliably conservative media outlets, and U of O students began to work themselves into a conniption fit about the mere presence of this American she-devil.
Coulter, one protest organizer said, practises “hate speech. She’s targeted the Jews, she’s targeted the Muslims, she’s targeted Canadians, homosexuals, women, almost everybody you could imagine.”
By the time she arrived, police were on standby. A crowd of angry students swarmed the front door.
Finally, Levant, with an air of great regret, took the microphone to announce that “it would be physically dangerous for Ann Coulter to proceed with this event” and that “this is an embarrassing day for the University of Ottawa and its student body.”
Coulter, after denouncing the school as “bush league,” pocketed her fee and moved on. So long, chumps.
And Ezra Levant had once again made his point.
That point being that Canada’s academy, including many of its students and professors, are a censorious, hypocritical bunch.
They will shout down and bully people they don’t like, but stand by nodding thoughtfully as speakers they favour — let’s say, anti-Israel activists — screech invectives that even Coulter probably wouldn’t resort to.
Coulter, after all, should probably be seen as a professional entertainer and, as such, knows inchoate fury isn’t terribly entertaining.
This isn’t to say she isn’t offensive. Telling a hijab-wearing Muslim student at the University of Western Ontario to “take a camel” if she can’t get on an American airplane is pretty crude.
So are many of the other things Coulter has said about gays, Arabs and feminists. You can look them up.
But to repeat a hackneyed truth: Free speech is a worthless concept unless it applies to speech you don’t like.
And you have to ask yourself: What exactly did the young Muslim woman at UWO expect, attending a speech by a self-described “bigoted, mean-spirited conservative” and then taking to the microphone to challenge her?
Instead of getting all twisted out of shape, it might have been better to simply ignore what Coulter had to say. If everyone did that, it would cut off her oxygen.
Or maybe the young Muslim woman could have just called Coulter a big stupid poopy-pants.
But, then, that would have ruined all Ezra’s fun.
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/03/24/f-rfa-macdonald.html#ixzz0j8hNQtiV