This article kind of speaks for itself – on so many levels; extremely interesting…

 

 

This article kind of speaks for itself – on so many levels; extremely interesting…

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/07/AR2009070702338.html

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/07/AR2009070702338.html

 

 

 

Gold Rush In Alaska

 

  This Story

  • Gold Rush In Alaska
  • Panicked Over Palin
  • A Starter, Not a Finisher

Wednesday, July 8, 2009 

 When you’re up to your waders in barracuda, blame the media.

And quit your job.

And say you did it for the people.

And hire an agent.

And try to keep a straight face.

On your way to the bank.

Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public, H.L. Mencken once said. Terribly elitist fellow, that Mencken. If only he were alive to witness the phenomenon of Sarah Palin, whose biography validates every cynical thought that ever found expression in his prolific prose.

Let’s just say, Palin is in no danger of going broke. From her book contract alone, she never has to worry about money again, according to one close insider.

She may be politically dead — “If I die, I die. So be it,” as Palin recently put it — but that depends on how one defines politics. In fact, adding mystery to confoundedness, Palin has enough supporters and fundraising potential to put a ground game in play in a matter of seconds. Just to toss in a sports metaphor, if I may.

Meanwhile, getting real, can we stop pretending that Palin is interested in anything other than her own ambition?

Can we also stop nodding assent every time she says the media are to blame for her self-inflicted wounds? The media invented Sarah Palin. Before the media shined their light on those no-place-like-home slippers, does anyone recall ever wondering what a governor of Alaska was up to?

Not that Alaska isn’t a beautiful, wildlife- and resource-rich state. And not that we don’t all admire the rugged, frontier spirit that makes Alaskans our kind of Americans. But it took the benighted East Coast media to put one Sarah Palin on the map of the lower 48.

Page 2 of 2   < Back     

Gold Rush In Alaska

There’s nothing wrong with ambition, of course. No one gets to the White House or the Iditarod finish line without it. But claiming selfless virtue — not to mention solidarity with wounded soldiers in Kosovo and Landstuhl, Germany — over personal preference is a herring of a different color.

“Let’s face it, she just doesn’t really want to govern, and she’s doing what’s best for her,” said a Republican campaign strategist who has worked with Palin.

“This is a win-win,” said another. “It’s a win for her because she is not politically viable, and now hopefully she can make a lot of money, have balance and affect culture in a positive way. It’s a win for the Republican Party because she was the female version of [George W.] Bush in some ways. She is not intellectually curious. We need and have smart, competent alternatives.”

Undoubtedly and understandably, Palin is weary of the fray. The crucial turning point was the attacks on her family. No one can honestly make the case that the Palins didn’t take more heat than other public families. That said, it isn’t difficult to avoid media attention. All one has to do is go to Alaska and stay put. But Palin, like the giddy Icarus, seems drawn to heat and light.

Palin also blamed frivolous ethics charges as a reason for her premature retirement. Alaskans lately have turned against the once-popular governor and filed complaints that have run up legal fees in the $500,000 range. Nobody wants that, surely, but that’s chump change for Palin, whose supporters tossed $400,000 her way the first month SarahPAC went online.

Finally, Palin blamed “a full-court press from the national level picking away right now” and said she “knows exactly when to pass the ball so that the team can win. And that is what I’m doing — keeping our eye on the ball that represents sound priorities. Remember, they include energy independence and smaller government and national security and freedom. And I know when it’s time to pass the ball for victory.”

Fortunately, Palin has hired a writer to help with her tell-all.

Insiders confirm that Palin felt she couldn’t accomplish as much as a besieged governor as she can as a private citizen working behind the scenes. While that may be true, the sidebar reveals a convenient rationale. The usual rule applies: Follow the money.

As a public speaker, Palin will be golden. Other rumors circulating suggest a television show, a possible newspaper column (but remember, Palin hates the mainstream media), and fundraising gigs where the erstwhile vice presidential candidate can retain her hot spot on center stage.

If that is altruism, there’s a lakeside house in Wasilla with a fabulous view of Russia you’re just gonna love.

kparker@kparker.com

 

 

Karl Malden, RIP

 

Karl Malden, RIP…

And, here, another of my favoured actors, gone… although I wish him well in the next stage, if there is one, as he seemed to have had a long, fulfiling life on this earth.  97?  I hope he enjoyed himself.

I remember him in DEAD RINGER with Bette Davis.  He made a huge impression on me in that movie… I felt so utterly bad at how unfairly the man was treated.  I identified with his character and I liked him, as an actor.  Later, he would become a staple on t.v. with THE STREETS OF SAN FRANCISCO… My sister absolutely loved Michael Douglas.  I couldn’t stand him.  I really liked the Malden character, or, maybe by that time, I liked the character simply because it was played by Malden and I had decided that I liked him, having meshed, in my young mind, him with the Dead Ringer character… and having convinced myself that noone could play it out that way without having the real sensitivity in ‘real life’… Yah, I know, it’s called acting, but I was young and naive… as opposed to my current old and naive, but that is quite another story.

Now I am curious to see the movie again… As I have not seen it in, maybe 40 years, but, obviously, it had affected me enough that I can still remember it.

Whatever the case, to Karl Malden, thank you… and may you rest in peace.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/03/movies/03appraisal.html?ref=movies

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/03/movies/03appraisal.html?ref=movies

 

 

An Appraisal

A Character Actor of Intensified Normalness

Published: July 2, 2009
It’s a face that you can’t help noticing. Not handsome in the usual movie-star way, by any means, but — befitting a man who defined what it meant to be a character actor — full of character. The jutting chin and oft-broken nose curve toward each other as though affixed to a Punch-and-Judy puppet, but Karl Malden’s face was not made for comedy. Like his voice, pitched between a honk and a growl, it was an instrument full of gravity and dignity, capable of showing strong measures of menace, passion and hurt.

Skip to next paragraph

Warner Brothers, via Photofest

Karl Malden with Vivien Leigh in the 1951 film “A Streetcar Named Desire.” More Photos »

Everett Collection

Karl Malden, left, and his partner, played by Richard Hatch, gathered information in “The Streets of San Francisco.” More Photos >

Associated Press

Karl Malden in 1950. More Photos >

Like most people who came of age after Mr. Malden’s big-screen heyday, I first saw that face on television, in a series of terrifying dramas about vacations gone awry that doubled as advertisements for American Express traveler’s checks. In the wake of a mishap involving American tourists menaced by brazen thieves, surly waiters, incompetent gendarmes or other nasty foreigners, Mr. Malden would stride into the frame in a trim suit and a sharp fedora, a figure at once reassuring and slightly threatening, an embodiment of probity, seriousness and practical no-nonsense Americanism. If you had to leave home — maybe not the best idea, all things considered — you’d better have a brusque, fatherly guy like this to back you up and bail you out.

This patriarchal capitalist pitchman persona was a variation on Mike Stone, the detective Mr. Malden played in the 1970s on “The Streets of San Francisco.” That show’s clean, mean sensibility holds up well against the arty forensics of the current “CSI”-dominated network crime-drama landscape. For most of the program’s run, Mr. Malden’s foil and partner was Michael Douglas, and the generational and stylistic contrast between them — counterculture versus old school, slick against gruff, pretty-boy next to plug-ugly — is no less satisfying for being a little too easy.

But Mr. Malden, who died Wednesday at 97, specialized in being uneasy, playing men who are variously worried, angry, disappointed and defeated. Like many other actors who distinguish themselves in supporting roles and whose charisma consists of a kind of intensified ordinariness, he has often been referred to as an everyman. That doesn’t seem quite right, though. In his best movie roles, mainly in films directed by Elia Kazan, Mr. Malden is specifically the other man, the guy defined partly by his lack of certain attributes abundantly present in the protagonist. The other man is never ruthless, or dangerous, or dashing, or cool. His regret may be that he could never have been a contender, but he makes up for it with a stoical sincerity that is all the more affecting for being so easy to discount.

Twice, in “A Streetcar Named Desire” and “On the Waterfront,” the magnetic protagonist was Marlon Brando, and in embodying Brando’s antithesis Mr. Malden achieved an unusual kind of heroism. In “Streetcar” he was Mitch, fumbling suitor for the favors of Vivien Leigh’s Blanche DuBois, his awkward gentleness a quiet rebuke to Stanley Kowalski’s brutish self-confidence. And in “Waterfront” his Father Barry, full of righteous rage and social concern, serves as the angel on Terry Malloy’s shoulder, a figure of conviction and moral clarity in a world lousy with corruption and double-dealing.

Mr. Malden’s blunt features, combined with the subtlety of his craft, helped provide a crucial ballast of realism in Kazan’s feverish fables of American life. His finest, strangest and most heartbreaking performance came in “Baby Doll,” in which he plays Archie Lee Meighan, the dull-witted, sexually frustrated (to put it mildly) proprietor of a decaying cotton plantation who is driven around the bend by the caprices of his child bride (Carroll Baker) and the machinations of a wily business rival (Eli Wallach). The film, like “Streetcar” a collaboration between Kazan and Tennessee Williams, is a pungent hothouse, ripe with free-floating eroticism and Southern Gothic motifs. That Mr. Malden seems so manifestly out of place in this environment — baffled, earnest and sweaty, a can of tomatoes dropped into a flower garden — is exactly what makes him so perfect in the film, which depends on his anxious, uncomprehending discomfort.

Mr. Malden’s achievement as an actor was both substantial and modest. The paradox of great character actors is that they are at once adaptable and unmistakable, irreducibly individual yet able to be typecast. And Karl Malden, especially in the 1950s, was one of the best. No other guy could ever be the other guy the way he could.

Sign in to RecommendNext Article in Movies (1 of 64) » A version of this article appeared in print on July 3, 2009, on page C1 of the New York edition.
 
 
Older entries »